Can We Refreeze The Arctic? This Scientist Certainly Thinks So

By

CCSS NAS-6 NCSS-7

Thanks to global warming, the ice in the Arctic Ocean is today about half of what it was in the 1980's. Given that the situation can only get worse and governments are unable to come to a consensus about how to reverse the trend, one scientist is proposing a radical solution - To use modern technology to repair the damage.

Harvard University's Professor David Keith who has published two papers on the subject is proposing a bold idea that involves injecting reflective particles into areas close to the Arctic ice caps, so that less of the sun's heat would be absorbed. This in turn, would result in lowering temperatures and help some of the Arctic water to refreeze. According to Keith's calculations, just a 0.5% reduction in sunlight penetration could restore the sea ice, back to its former glory. The best part is, it would all be accomplished without cutting back any human created greenhouse gases.

While this may sounds almost impossible, the scientist maintains that the whole thing could be accomplished with the help of a few modified Gulfstream jets and cost just $8 billion USD. While that may sound a lot, it is a minuscule amount, if this idea really works.

So, what is the holdup? Why aren't governments all over the world jumping at being the first to give this a try? Because this kind of open air large-scale geoengineering has never been done before and nobody knows what the side effects will be - It could all work out fine or lead to something totally disastrous like collapsing the remaining ice sheets or worse, cause a massive drought. In fact environmentalists are so vary that the United Nations Convention on Biological Diversity has a permanent ban on any such human attempt to try change nature.

Even Professor Keith agrees with that stance, which is why he is just laying out the idea in his research papers, but not, advocating its implementation - At least not just yet! Hopefully, we will be able to avoid these kind of experimental solutions and reverse global warming by simply, altering the way we lead our day-to-day lives.

Resources: inhabitat.com, dailymail.co.uk

Cite Article
Vocabulary List
accomplishedadvocatingalteringconsensusdisastrousdroughtenvironmentalistsexperimentalgeoengineeringholdupimplementationmaintainsminusculemodifiedpenetrationpermanentradicalreflectivestancevary
244 Comments
  • SMILEY4Monday, March 25, 2019 at 5:00 pm
    UMMMM I FEAL SOOO BAD
    • waaaaaaWednesday, October 17, 2018 at 12:55 am
      Omg I feel sooooo bad
      • smiley4
        smiley4Friday, November 18, 2016 at 8:21 pm
        I feel bad for the polar bears. I don't want them to go extinct! I hope they can fix it!!!!
        • GILLIA NWednesday, October 5, 2016 at 4:31 pm
          really risky!! i wonder if they are going to take the chance!?!?!?!?!?!?
          • S of LibertyThursday, February 4, 2016 at 6:59 am
            I hope they do the idea and it works without side affects.
            • technobladeWednesday, December 9, 2015 at 11:50 am
              that really really sounds like a good idea if we knew the side affects:(
              • diamondkid
                diamondkidSaturday, February 21, 2015 at 1:54 pm
                Didn't know that!
                • iikattastic
                  iikattasticSunday, January 11, 2015 at 9:55 am
                  o.o so sad
                  • Julia BondThursday, September 25, 2014 at 5:50 pm
                    VERY VERY VERY VERY risky ........good thing they ban it.
                    • dumbhumbugmum45
                      dumbhumbugmum45Sunday, June 8, 2014 at 4:38 pm
                      wow but unknown sude effects may be wurse than expected!*oh no to hot*!