The Events That Led To The U.S. Airstrikes In Syria

By Meera Dolasia on April 9, 2017

CCSS NCSS-5 Word Search
President Donald Trump receives a briefing on a military strike on Syria from his National Security team (Photo Credit: Shealah Craighead/Whitehouse.Gov)

On April 4, the world woke up to the news that Syrian President Bashar al-Assad’s army had conducted airstrikes targeting the town of Khan Sheikhoun in the rebel-held province of Idlib. The attack killed 85 people, including 16 women and 23 children, and wounded over 350. Images of the victims choking and gasping for breath on social media and reports from Doctors Without Borders, which supports medical clinics in rebel-held areas, led to the conclusion that it had been a chemical attack. Experts speculate the government used sarin, a toxic nerve gas, massive exposure to which can cause instant death.

This is not the first chemical attack on the rebels since the Syrian civil war began in 2011. The deadliest one, which occurred in August 2013, killed over a thousand civilians in eastern Ghouta, near the country’s capital, Damascus. World leaders initially contemplated airstrikes to try to destroy the government's chemical arsenal. However, Assad’s close ally Russian President Vladimir Putin managed to keep military conflict at bay with a promise that the Syrian government would dispose of its chemical weapon hoard by mid-2014. A few months later the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons, (OPCW), which supervised the process, confirmed that 95% of the chemical weapons had been destroyed and the issue was considered resolved.

Syria peace talks in Vienna, 30 October 2015 (Photo Credit: By U.S. Department of State from United States via Wikimedia Commons)

Tuesday’s attack that horrified everyone, including U.S. President Donald Trump, was the first clue that the Assad regime may not have lived up to its end of the bargain. However, Syria’s Foreign Minister, Walid Muallem refutes this claim and insists that the harmful gas was stored in the rebel weapon depot destroyed by a warplane. The Khan Sheikhoun activists, however, denied the allegations, saying they had no toxic chemicals. Given the Syrian government’s record, the world is inclined to believe the rebels.

The first indication that Mr. Trump was planning to take action against the Syrian government came during a news conference on Wednesday afternoon. He told reporters, “It’s very, very possible, and I will tell you it has already happened, that my attitude toward Syria and Assad, has changed very much.” This statement referred to the U.S. President’s campaign promise that unlike former president Barack Obama, he would not be focused on ousting President Assad from power. Mr. Trump later added, “It crossed a lot of lines for me. When you kill innocent children, innocent babies, little babies, with a chemical gas that was so lethal, then that crosses many lines, beyond a red line, many many lines.” He concluded: “I now have [a] responsibility, and I will have that responsibility and carry it very proudly.”

President Trump’s letter to US Congress (Image Credit: Whitehouse.Gov)

On Thursday, April 6, after a meeting with the Secretary of State, Rex Tillerson, the Secretary of Defense, James Mattis, and members of the national security team, the President authorized an aerial military strike in Syria. At 7:40pm Eastern Mediterranean Time, Tomahawk missiles, launched from destroyers in the Eastern Mediterranean, began bombarding the Shayrat air base. White House Press Secretary, Sean Spicer, later reported that the 59 missiles had destroyed all the desired targets, including the aircrafts, aircraft shelters, ammunition supply bunkers, and air defense systems.

As would be expected, President Trump’s decision to take this bold step is being met with mixed reactions. American allies like the U.K., France, and Germany praised the action, asserting that it was long overdue, while Russia and Iran, both strong supporters of the Syrian government, strongly denounced the attack, calling it an “aggression.”

President Donald Trump receives a briefing on a military strike on Syria from his National Security team (Photo Credit: Shealah Craighead/Whitehouse.Gov)

The single U.S. strike is of course not enough to stop President Assad from his attempts to crush the six-year rebellion that has killed thousands of civilians and forced millions more to seek refuge in other countries. On Saturday, the brutal dictator showed his defiance with further military strikes in Khan Sheikhoun. The only silver lining is that they were conventional, not chemical, bombs. Hopefully, both sides will be able to resolve the volatile situation peacefully!

Resources: Washingtonpost.com, Vox.com,telegraph.co.uk,cnn.com

Listen to the Article: Play Audio

Create MLA, Chicago, or APA Website Citation

Create a website citation for this article. We support MLA8, MLA7, APA, and Chicago citation formats.

VocabularyPlay Game

activistsaerialaggressionallegationsallyarsenalassertingbombardingconflictcontemplatedconventionaldenounceddictatorlethalmassivemissilesoustingrebellionrefutesregimeresolvedspeculatesupervisedtoxicvolatile
Name:
Date:

Reading Comprehension (8 questions)

  1. What happened on April 4?
  2. How did experts realize it was a chemical attack?

Critical Thinking Challenge

Do you believe President Trump should have waited to get consensus from...

Vocabulary in Context

However, Assad’s close ally, Russian President Vladimir Putin, managed to keep military conflict at bay with a promise that the Syrian government would dispose its ...

175 Comments
to use your custom avatar.
  • ElieSunday, July 9, 2017 at 7:07 am
    Stop doing this ! People are getting killed! 😞
    • v dogWednesday, June 7, 2017 at 11:29 am
      The strike in Syria was neccary. Im not the biggest trump fan in the world but he did the right thing. You can mess around with america, but when assad authorized the gas attack that pushes the limit, thanks for reading god bless yall
      • 💘ilwad👗Tuesday, June 6, 2017 at 6:47 am
        we should run away!!
        • PaytonThursday, June 1, 2017 at 6:46 am
          We should stop this
          • MemeFriday, May 12, 2017 at 7:41 am
            Well this is bad.
            • Hockey448061Thursday, May 11, 2017 at 2:38 pm
              This could get ugly if we don't make a stop :O
              • jellyana
                jellyanaWednesday, May 10, 2017 at 6:23 pm
                we can change this
                • aesijLSKJBFWednesday, May 10, 2017 at 6:18 pm
                  these comments... this is really deep, but guess it matches the topic: deep and intense, huh?
                  • DecaulWednesday, May 10, 2017 at 4:00 pm
                    why is this for kids?
                    • Mr.KrabsWednesday, May 10, 2017 at 5:29 am
                      This needs to stop! they are killing so many innocent people! Pray that there is a way to solve this without violence!

                      Recent Comments

                      Brandon wrote:

                      Minecraft is hard
                      Minecraft As A Mandatory Subject...

                      Brandon wrote:

                      Minecraft is awsome😁💩💩💩💩💩😺
                      Minecraft As A Mandatory Subject...

                      Cat wrote:

                      It isn't cool it is bad
                      Alaska Fishermen Grapple With Ki...

                      JmPlanteras wrote:

                      im not poor im just in wrong pla...
                      Does It Really Rain Diamonds On ...

                      Our Apps and Plugins

                      ALA